Whether to abandon shunning of family members is a touchy topic that may have raised its ugly head at the policy table of the current governing body.
I have mixed feelings on whether they may change policy. Here's why it wouldn't surprise me.
Thanks to the internet, fence-sitting Jehovah's Witnesses learn that are other options. Instead of playing the game Watchtower wants them to play -- "If you agree, stay in. If you don't agree, get out, but make sure and tell us first. That way we can announce a quarantine so you become off-limits to even your relatives who no longer live with you. Your influence to the rest of the flock will be extremely curtailed."
The fade option many are choosing nowadays is not easy but it is undoubtedly causing the governing body great consternation. It is where the fader chooses to stay below the GB's radar and not declare his reversed allegiance to Watchtower. Instead of being quarantined, the fader is free to mingle and talk and enjoy a convivial family meal or get-together. The fader can do normal family favors -- fix a child's automobile, paint a parent's living room, assist a niece on her algebra -- thereby continuing to properly earn respect from those he loves. Worse, however, in the collective mind of the governing body, is where the fader subtly uses this well-earned respect to show certain loved ones the flaws in Watchtower teachings, their massive contradictions, their dishonesty and coverups.
No it is not easy for the fader to occasionally attend a boring meeting, fake a door knock when it's his turn, force a smile during those infrequent but disturbing shepherding calls.
The governing body may someday decide to somehow bring these faders out in the open -- let them declare the fact that they no longer wish to be members but not punitively mark them them as respects family membership. This single act could hinder the fader's subtle sabotage . Sure, the fader's attempts to undermine Watchtower may not cease completely. Without the penalty of being shunned, however, much of the fader's anger would be blunted. Who cares? Let them figure it out for themselves, he may reason.
A change in current policy would affect membership numbers. They would certainly decline but the GB could feel that those remaining would be comprised of mostly valid flock members, not wolves in sheep clothing.
Family members under this revised policy would now be on guard, knowing where the former member stands. The former member would still be quarantined, but only in limited fashion as respects family members not living under the same roof.
Sure, the fader may be a shunned and marked person by others in the congregation but he can still take his mother grocery shopping followed by a relaxing soup and sandwich luncheon before returning her to her home. Family gatherings would no longer be off-limits.
A change in policy remains to be seen.
Family is one thing but there are other loved ones, long-developed friendships which the fader wants to be able to continue embracing in association. The fade option will continue as long as shunning continues.
Len